Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Hayabusa <peregrine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:02:06 +0100
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:35:25 GMT, "Alan Crozier"
<name1.name2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Would trade and commerce be enough to make a native population
>adopt a new language? I would imagine that it would require some
>speakers of the new language actually settling in the country.
Just settling?!? That usually means in more concrete terms to kill the
males and rape the females.
>If those speakers also had power and prestige there would be
>greater incentive for the natives to adopt the new language.
Oh, there you are.
>In other words, I incline to the old view of the Celts as an
>invading warrior aristocracy in Ireland, whose language
>gradually dominated and eradicated the old one(s). The speakers
>of Celtic need not have been numerous to achieve this, just
>powerful. This old view is not inconsist with the latest DNA
>evidence.
>
>Or am I missing something?
Not really. It would fit the most likely pattern.
fkoe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- References:
- Celtic Origins
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Alan Crozier
- Celtic Origins
- Prev by Date: Re: Black Etruscans?
- Next by Date: Re: Celtic Origins
- Previous by thread: Re: Celtic Origins
- Next by thread: Re: Celtic Origins
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading