Re: Celtic Origins
- From: "bernard" <bernard_connor11@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jan 2006 23:15:46 -0800
Michael Kuettner wrote:
> "bernard" <bernard_connor11@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1138385757.090105.83470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >JMB wrote:
> >> Don't be daft Inger. We all know you have a superiority complex about
> >> Swedes, but they were not, and are not, gods. The Tuatha De Danann were
> >> gods.
>
> > Why the insult? Inger has not claimed any superiority for Swedes.
> > Besides, if the Tuatha de Danann ever existed, Sweden certainly did not
> > exist as a distinct nation at that time,nor did she make any such
> > claim.
>
> > Bernard.
>
> *** off, sockpuppet.
> If you aren´t willing to learn, go to alt.village.idiots.
>
> Chemistry and Archaeology ?
> Half-baked arguments and running away, just like Ingwer the moron.
>
> Ontopic contributions from you ? None.
>
> Either read the archives or *** off.
>
> Was that clear enough for you ?
>
> With disregards,
>
> MK
Just try doing that which is anatomically impossible.
Bernard.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Celtic Origins
- References:
- Celtic Origins
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Hayabusa
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Uwe Müller
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Uwe Müller
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: bernard
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: JMB
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: bernard
- Re: Celtic Origins
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Celtic Origins
- Prev by Date: Re: Celtic Origins
- Next by Date: Re: Celtic Origins
- Previous by thread: Re: Celtic Origins
- Next by thread: Re: Celtic Origins
- Index(es):