Re: Clams before Columbus

tk,
you, as well as Yuri, missed in your debate back then ALL needed facts to
prove the Clams correct.
It's no use for you to refer to that debate any more.
Heard earlier today from a scholar of Scandinavian History and Archaeology
that the ref which been presented not only is valid but that there is much
more to come from that corner. Doesn't matter what you wrote back then, if
you want to be able to catch up here you need to learn a bit more about
Scandinavian archaeology and Scandinavian Medieval History.

Inger E




.