Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Doug Weller <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 06:49:38 +0000
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 05:18:49 GMT, in sci.archaeology, "Inger E.Johansson"
<inger e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seppo,
I don't like the way you express yourself,
but you are correct. What Doug and Tom using others to lean to tried to do
more than once is defamation of Wolter by presenting false information.
Contrary to Doug and Tom Wolter are a scholar in the subject geology.
Excuse me? Where do I come in on this? I may well have forgotten something
I wrote, but exactly what did I say or are you just bringing me in for
casual abuse. I see you have also reposted Seppo's lies, and reposting
surely means you approve of them.
Contrary to them Wolter is an Academic scholar in the subject which in
almost all countries belong to the natural science field. According to some
of the people here the natural science field's results are stronger in every
other case but KRS than the humaniora science field.
Since you have brought my name in I will comment on this claim. In English
speaking countries an 'Academic' is someone who teaches at a university. I
don't think Wolter would claim to be an academic. Exactly why do you give
him this status?
He is clearly an expert petrographer, I would never deny this.
You are claiming that I have put forward false information about him. This
is abuse and illegal under Swedish law, which makes your posts criminal
according to your standards I believe.
And I'm not going to go back through past posts, but what exactly did Tom
say that was false?
Doug
--
And you are correct.
I have written following before text deleted by them and I write it again:
Wolter's merits:
"Bachelor Degree - Geology - University of Minnesota-Duluth, 1982
Honorary Masters - Geology - University of Minnesota-Duluth, 1987"
"Professional Geologist (PG), MN Registration #30024
Certified Professional Geologist (CPG), Certification #8260"
above as a lot more you can read about in:
http://www.aipgmn.org/wolter_bio.htm
It's incredible that anyone tries to put forward false information about
Wolter leaning to someone who definitely hasn't his Academic and Scientific
meriths in any of the fields where KRS can, could, should and has been up
for discussion!
Inger E
"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:43E41C9B.864B25F6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
E.Johansson"
Doug Weller wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:33:20 GMT, in sci.archaeology, "Inger
yourself<inger e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[SNIP]
since when do you deny having written UNDER Tom's text "Wolter isn't an
academic,.." without protesting to it?
When you write within or under text without writing a correction or
protesting this juridical means that you don't object. Since you don't
object to the lines where this false information is feed, then you
have written under same false information!
I can point out examples of posts where you have written text under
Seppo's libels of me and others without correcting them.
Is it any wonder Douggie attracts a convicted criminal and stalker to
"advise" him, like one of his own kind! The puppy farmer is a habitual
LIAR - this is another such instance - I have NOT libelled the puppy
farmer (which is not a "libel" contrary to what the silly old fart
thinks) at all.
Further more the poor *** doesn't even understand English.
"Written UNDER Tom's text" (and then quoting what that person wrote
UNDER Tom's text) DOES NOT mean that TOM wrote it, as the senile old
fart alleges. In the puppy farmer's rush to vilify Inger once again,
it ends up accusing it's own puppy TOM, of defamation!
That of course
makes you a party to them according to your lights and is surely a
criminal act in Sweden, right?
Only, the real point here is that we see Douggie DEFEND the defamation
of Scott Wolter (and falling foul of his own allegations by including
it in the post) - and this is NOT the first such instance Douggie has
been involved in - after all HE, Douggie, has implied that Wolter is a
"nazi sympathiser" in the past!! This IS what Douggie does in order to
preserve the dogma and the pre-Columbian brick wall!
Of course simultaneously we see Douggie's puppy, Tom, jump in, yapping
to DEFEND the defamation and add to it - no doubt to protect its
"master". Oh and this is AFTER Inger has posted the following, but
secretly deleted by both the puppy farmer and its puppy in their
replies:
[restore Inger's text]
Wolter's merits:
"Bachelor Degree - Geology - University of Minnesota-Duluth, 1982
Honorary Masters - Geology - University of Minnesota-Duluth, 1987"
"Professional Geologist (PG), MN Registration #30024
Certified Professional Geologist (CPG), Certification #8260"
above as a lot more you can read about in:
http://www.aipgmn.org/wolter_bio.htm
[end restore]
In this post we have again seen the "whatever it takes" attitude once
more, but how the hell do either expect to be taken seriously when
they resort to downright dishonest tactics such as those seen above!
--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Doug Weller --
Doug & Helen's Dogs http://www.dougandhelen.com
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- References:
- Wolter on peer review.
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Tedd Jacobs
- Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Wolter on peer review.
- Prev by Date: Re: Clams before Columbus
- Next by Date: Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- Previous by thread: Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- Next by thread: Re: Correct info re Wolter's academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
- Index(es):