Re: The Early Germans
- From: "Inger E.Johansson" <inger e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:04:38 GMT
"Uwe Müller" <uwemueller@xxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:ds4obj$gsl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cauldrons.
"Michael Kuettner" <miksbg@xxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:ds3bgv$cir$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
news:3pu9u1t1s1v6iakfvbkbdvh2hke9bepj99@xxxxxxxxxx
"Hayabusa" <peregrine@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:59:21 GMT, "Alan Crozier"Yes, it is. But, as Uwe has pointed out, there are arguments against
<name1.name2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for that link, Peter.
Interesting that Todd on page 20 conveys an opinion on the
origin of the Gundestrup cauldron:
"a work of an eastern Celtic master based on the lower Danube in
the later secondor earlier first century BC".
AFAIK this is the standard interpretation, I have heard it a couple
times before.
that interpretation.
Me ? I believe in the Danube - theory.
After all, somehow these elephants must have ended up onGermanic tribes don't come into the play here.
the cauldron, and they weren't rampaging through northern Jutland at
200BCE. - Neither, of course, through Dacia. But it is far easier to
imagine that a Dacian silver smith knew about them than a Germanic
artisan at the end of the world.
Just as a reminder so as to not muddy the waters further.
It's Thracian against Celt.
I would not be so sure about that. Put the Gundestrup piece in a 2nd c. AD
context (as suggested by the Planetary Vases) and look for silver
And the contemporary documents doesn't name Thracians as the old group
Thracians but as Alemanic alternatively Gothic from 166 AD. Have name on
some of them due to their queer behavior. If you look at Orosius and Zosimus
mentioning of the fightings you will find that they also say that there were
many groups that at that time lived in earlier Scythic land who was called
Scyths but weren't of the Ancient Scyths. Both historians happened :-) to
manage to write about this in their 7th chapther.
Inger E
first
Somehow it would be fascinating to find out just how much people knew
about each other in those times. For example, did the news of
Alexanders conquest of the Persian empire spread to northern Europe? -
Almost certainly not.
No Greeks north of Marsillia; gossip in harbour taverns ? Yes.
But as it didn't affext them and they didn't even know where persia was
The adoption of the cline is supposed to have spread in 60 to 80 years
to the Greeks and then to the Celts (remember the Hochdorf burial). Therein
should have been intimate and reliable contacts between Celts and Greeks
Late Hallstatt times. And those ties were close enough to also haveof
punic/phoenecian furniture distributed north of the Alps.
...
I would assume that they did; big A's war affected the eastern Med,Not in the Iron age. The tradenets seem to have broken down at the end
and was probably taverne talk subject from Syracuse to the Atlantic.
thenaval
copper and bronze age.
The tradenet is what those early iron age residences (princely sites) are
all about. And the change in domination of the western Med, after the
battles with Etruscans and Phoenecians, shows up fast enough as adifference
in the origin of imported goods in those early Latène burials. They have
direct Greek imports while the late Hallstatt ones show Etruscan
intermediaries. Would all of this have been forgotten to be re-invented in
Phillips time?
snip >
have fun
Uwe Mueller
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Hayabusa
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: The Early Germans
- References:
- The Early Germans
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Hayabusa
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Uwe Müller
- The Early Germans
- Prev by Date: Re: The Early Germans
- Next by Date: Re: Celtic Origins
- Previous by thread: Re: The Early Germans
- Next by thread: Re: The Early Germans
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading