Re: Wolter on peer review.



Hayabusa wrote:

On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:00:39 GMT, Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

As he belatedly states "I don't think there is evidence of any of that
in this case" - then WHY make the totally baseless allegations in the
first place? It is to PLANT THE SEED of doubt for others followers of
his Dogma to create fictions, eg like Doug Weller's odious implied
"Nazi supporter" view and like madness Tom has previously supported!

Seppo, if you want to achieve anything, don't make such statements.

.....and allow such rampant allegations be propagated unhindered? Why -
specially when there is no demonstrable truth in such?

I
don't know Tom that much, but I do know Doug from 10 years ago, and
there's a reason why I trust him.

Oh. I "trust" him as well. I trust him to follow his standard routine
as observed - eg one such thing is resort to fabrications that I have
"libelled" him. BTW, much can change in 10 years.

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.