Re: Wolter on peer review.



Tom McDonald wrote:

Inger E.Johansson wrote:
"Hayabusa" <peregrine@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:h7m7u1t2i6didq2r7h1ds2v2kq03f3ahpi@xxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:00:39 GMT, Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


As he belatedly states "I don't think there is evidence of any of that
in this case" - then WHY make the totally baseless allegations in the
first place? It is to PLANT THE SEED of doubt for others followers of
his Dogma to create fictions, eg like Doug Weller's odious implied
"Nazi supporter" view and like madness Tom has previously supported!

Seppo, if you want to achieve anything, don't make such statements. I
don't know Tom that much, but I do know Doug from 10 years ago, and
there's a reason why I trust him.

fkoe


There is a reason why many more than Seppo and me(Inger) don't trust Doug at
all. That reason comes from the simple fact that Doug never ever been able
to present any valid information in the Kensington Runestone case as well as
in any other case where Scandinavians in NA pre-Columbus outside L'anse
Meadows been on the agenda. It's a hugh mistake to lean to Birgitta Wallace.
Not only has she presented false information, misinterpreted and such as
well, but if she has a degree at all in Scandinavian History, she didn't
take that when studying here in Gothenburg before she left for Newfoundland.
She managed to write an acceptable article in an Danish work the other year.
Acceptable but not completely correct there either. She done a good work in
Newfoundland, but she is by no means an expert or scholar of Scandinavian
History. Thus it's outridges to put her assumptions forward at all in the
Kensington Runestone case.

I wonder whether anyone can point me to peer reviewed work by
Birgitta Wallace relating to the KRS, or associated studies in
the region? I have heard complaints against Wallace in this
regard, but I will not accept assertions by Inger as evidence
without reading the original peer reviewed work.

Not only have you "heard", but I note that TWICE in the last few days,
you have posted criticism of her allegations regarding the KRS
yourself - her unsupported and fabricated claims made to discredit the
KRS and research by others.

As for Inger's attack on Doug, well she has long maintained that
it takes one to know one. 'Nuff said.

I see.... so Tom's "logic" here is - to know one has been hit in the
face with a clenched fist, first requires the hitting ANOTHER in the
face with a clenched fist....... well...... that IS Tom's so called
"logic" in that last part! Shhheeeeezzzz.........


--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Correct info re Wolters academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
    ... <inger e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> ... Contrary to Doug and Tom Wolter are a scholar in the subject geology. ... LIAR - this is another such instance - I have NOT libelled the puppy ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: New "I" Catagory List, Name Confusion
    ... > Inger E Johansson wrote: ... > Don't tell us to do our homework; it's your duty to show Doug ... Here we see the SOCK PUPPET of Douggie again....... ... appear that Tom derives a lot of pleasure out of it...... ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wolter on peer review.
    ... eg like Doug Weller's odious implied ... "Nazi supporter" view and like madness Tom has previously supported! ... It's a hugh mistake to lean to Birgitta Wallace. ... Birgitta Wallace relating to the KRS, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Disabled .wmf - now I cant view pictures in Windows XP - HELP!
    ... Doug: Here's the link: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/ ... Tom ... | In reading some info in the security newsgroup, ... | blog, it appears software dep blocking does not work, only hardware. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)