Re: The Early Germans
- From: "Alan Crozier" <name1.name2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:12:21 GMT
"Inger E.Johansson" <inger e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:ruKFf.43978$d5.199918@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alan,present here in
the references I never ever no matter what you say will
group are such that those who per-viewed my work from anacademic view(all
in all four scholars the editor I was discussing with suppliedtwo of them)
said were so strong and not published before. I will neverever give them up
in an open group. Charing chapters of it with single scholarof other
discipline, that I do all the time but not and never in anopen group.
didn't want to
Reason why the manuscript isn't edited is that the editor
print the notes neither as page-notes or end-notes. The samenotes which
gave the ref that the scholars apploud..... Either those stayor the
manuscript goes I said. So the manuscript exists and is 320pages long.
Try a different publisher. The people at Nordic Academic Press
aren't afraid of footnotes. And publish quickly, before someone
else discovers that source and gets all the credit.
Alan
--
Alan Crozier
Lund
Sweden
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: The Early Germans
- References:
- The Early Germans
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Hayabusa
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Uwe Müller
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: The Early Germans
- From: Inger E.Johansson
- The Early Germans
- Prev by Date: Re: The Early Germans
- Next by Date: Re: Wolter on peer review.
- Previous by thread: Re: The Early Germans
- Next by thread: Re: The Early Germans
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|