Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor

From: Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:02:40 -0500

P.T. wrote:

You know, mentioning archaeology in passing in a post to an archaeological ng does not, magically, make it on-topic here.

But by all means, feel free to bring documented evidence of the archaeology of Jesus. What a concept!

<snip>
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor
  - From: P.T.

Prev by Date: Re: The Real Bible Code
Next by Date: Re: Etymology and archaeology
Previous by thread: The Real Bible Code
Next by thread: Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor
... mentioning archaeology in passing in a post to an archaeological ... archaeology of Jesus. ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor
... mentioning archaeology in passing in a post to an ... feel free to bring documented evidence of the ... archaeology of Jesus. ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: Id like a better understanding of the debate
... stick-drawing of archaeology, nothing is known until all the evidence ... agrees with written records (I'm pretty sure you mean the Bible; ... Now once we determine the age of something and THEN one may ...
(talk.origins)
Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
... Except for Doug and Tom and you. ... <snip DW> ... add some archaeology to this group (c 140 new ... Then I read the insane rants of Deppo and IEJ and see ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
... I never killfile on command. ... I'm mostly interested in European Archaeology because ... Doug Weller seldom posts here nowadays. ...
(sci.archaeology)