Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor


"IE J" <inger_e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jYO%f.52941$d5.207848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"P.T." <pt@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:5QO%f.47528$Da7.43441@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"IE J" <inger_e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7AO%f.52926$d5.207945@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Patty,
you are so way out of line from truth as anyone can be.
It's a pitty that you haven't studied History and Religion enough to
know
that you are making a big big mistake in your assumptions.

Why don't you enlighten me?

It's you, and you alone, who rised this absurd thread.
If you believe that you are correct,
you should do what Tom told you would be good,
you should present the factors which you belive to be true and why. In
other
word present a valid assumption and/or theory linking it to archaeologic
and/or historic documentation(which btw if old also is/are artifacts in
themselves). Please present an analyse of the premisses needed for the
assumption of yours to be true as well.

I recommended a book. I am sorry if you would rather squabble than learn
something or teach others something.

All the best,
Patty


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor
    ... you are so way out of line from truth as anyone can be. ... It's a pitty that you haven't studied History and Religion enough to ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Jesus Dynasty - Dr. James Tabor
    ... you are so way out of line from truth as anyone can be. ... It's a pitty that you haven't studied History and Religion enough to know ...
    (sci.archaeology)