Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:09:16 +1200
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:26:42 GMT, prd <X_header@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In sci.archaeology message
news:deE0g.31688$1q4.8720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx by
prd <X_header@xxxxxxxxxxx> . . . :
In sci.archaeology message
news:4442cfbc$0$44652$dbd4f001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx by "Peter Alaca"
<P.Alaca@xxxxxx> . . . :
Eric Stevens wrote:
news:76h542dtug2cs3sj7pnf4jbu2ln8dif4vn@xxxxxxx
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:03:45 GMT, prd <X_header@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In sci.archaeology message
news:1145072816.756691.286810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx by
"Tom McDonald" <kiltmac@xxxxxxxxx> . . . :
You know Tom, if Inger was having any success at what she
claimed she might actually know what she is talking about,
right.
All the institute does when they think something is going on
illegally is to block an IP, it happens all the time, they
have a computer connected to the routers and they simply shut
down a connection. My IP has never been blocked, but if you
should note my IP is not from a educational institute, has
not been for quite some time.
I'm not saying there is any causal connection but I have long
wondered whether or not it was entirely coincidence that you
stopped posting from your 'educational institute' at about the
last time that Inger was making such a fuss about you.
Going back through my archives I find that the last post from
your 'educational institute' was 15 May 2004.
Do better research.
This morning I checked, I posted my last message from 128.2....
on November 29th, the they set up the new software for everyone
(except me it turns out) in late November or December so says my
associate. The rate of posting from either account was on the decline
mid summer of 2004.
I can't easily know (and in fact don't know) that 128.2.... is your
educational institute. But I do know that a message with a header
containing "NNTP-Posting-Host: bcm208-88.anderson.dhcp.bcm.tmc.edu" is
from an educational institute.
What I see is what you get.
For a long time
after that you appeared to have used a number of hosts,
including one with a dynamically allocated IP address. Since
17 Dec 2005, under the ID of 'prd' you have been using a host
with the the fixed IP address of 12.73.57.218 although you
continued using Philip Dietiker on the same IP address until
15 Feb 2006.
Silliness. Anyone can post from google or other services. My
principle for UseNet is that I use a filter so I don't have to
read the [endless] garbage of some people. The new system does
not allow us to recieve email or news without using an online
version of microsoft outlook. No ability to filter mail or news.
Correct that, this morning I was aided in the installation of the PC
based version so that my settings are preserved. Dubious that I will
use the system since I am going to stick with the current nick.
and 12.73..... has never given me a fixed IP, this is dial-up.
Yesdterday I had ..6.15 and today its 35.93, some arm-chair
researchers should get their facts strait.
Eric Stevens
.
- References:
- Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- From: IE J
- Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- From: IE J
- Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- Next by Date: Re: To Alan Re: Early Christian Danes
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- Next by thread: Re: OT - to whom it may concern
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|