Re: Minotauros

hagen wrote: news:1147210119.614429.45200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for your response! This looks at least like a new begining;
but by what reason are you not convinced, that it is of short cut
calendrical nature?
This is what I say:
Imagine a scenario of 22 couples holding 61 weekly meetings each year
If B, by way of example, is unavoidable detained, then A stands as
surety:(B)A. All 22 couples are obliged to participate by both in at
least two weekly gatherings pro anno. A further set of complicated
rules are followed strictly, and carefully entered into the annual
minutes. Such construction, in its broader aspects, corresponds with
the platonic bodies that I've discovered, whereas a language-structure
in verse and with rhymes and grammar do not produces minutely
gnomonical arrangements by itself (v).
Point: The various translations don't even follow a common agreement
upon the length of the sentenses in a presumed text, because of its
complexity.- E.F.A.N.K. - ( Evidence for a non-linguistic key ).
O.H.

Although it is not perfect, I admire your mastering of Ingerish.
You must have visited Linkoping at least 13 times.

--
p.a.

.