Re: Minotauros
- From: "hagen" <dan5mark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 May 2006 14:28:39 -0700
Thank you for your response! This looks at least like a new begining;
but by what reason are you not convinced, that it is of short cut
calendrical nature?
This is what I say:
Imagine a scenario of 22 couples holding 61 weekly meetings each year
If B, by way of example, is unavoidable detained, then A stands as
surety:(B)A. All 22 couples are obliged to participate by both in at
least two weekly gatherings pro anno. A further set of complicated
rules are followed strictly, and carefully entered into the annual
minutes. Such construction, in its broader aspects, corresponds with
the platonic bodies that I've discovered, whereas a language-structure
in verse and with rhymes and grammar do not produces minutely
gnomonical arrangements by itself (v).
Point: The various translations don't even follow a common agreement
upon the length of the sentenses in a presumed text, because of its
complexity.- E.F.A.N.K. - ( Evidence for a non-linguistic key ).
O.H.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minotauros
- From: grapheus
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- References:
- Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: IE J
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Alan Crozier
- Minotauros
- Prev by Date: Re: Minotauros
- Next by Date: Re: Minotauros
- Previous by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Next by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Index(es):
Loading