Re: Minotauros
- From: "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:07:53 +0200
hagen wrote: news:1147296618.759757.31530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is all very well, but as long as my ideas of a calendar are a
realistic possibility,
Saying so doesn't mean it is.
two camps should by now be visible, reflecting
the opinions of historians and archaeologists interested in this
topic. Either the signs are letters in a text, or symbols expressing a
calendar system.
Or they are decorative.
What concerns Jean Faucounau's's translation, his hypotheses are of
course contradicting mine, with no room for discussion.
If there is no room for discussion, there is no point in posting here.
--
p.a.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Minotauros
- References:
- Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: IE J
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Dylan Sung
- Re: Minotauros
- From: IE J
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Minotauros
- Prev by Date: Re: Fire ecology N and S of the Alps since the last ice age
- Next by Date: Re: Maps of the 1500's
- Previous by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Next by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Index(es):