Re: Minotauros
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:32:29 +1200
On Thu, 11 May 2006 00:07:53 +0200, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:
hagen wrote: news:1147296618.759757.31530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is all very well, but as long as my ideas of a calendar are a
realistic possibility,
Saying so doesn't mean it is.
two camps should by now be visible, reflecting
the opinions of historians and archaeologists interested in this
topic. Either the signs are letters in a text, or symbols expressing a
calendar system.
Or they are decorative.
What concerns Jean Faucounau's's translation, his hypotheses are of
course contradicting mine, with no room for discussion.
If there is no room for discussion, there is no point in posting here.
There is room for discussion if one protagonist or the other can
produce a convincing argument. However there is no point in the mere
repetition of the same old arguments over and over again.
Eric Stevens
.
- References:
- Re: Minotauros
- From: IE J
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Dylan Sung
- Re: Minotauros
- From: IE J
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- Prev by Date: Re: "The little people" - possibly related to Flores?
- Next by Date: Re: Minotauros
- Previous by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Next by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|