Re: Minotauros
- From: "hagen" <dan5mark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 May 2006 01:12:20 -0700
hagen wrote: news:1147296618.759757.31530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is all very well, but as long as my ideas of a calendar are a
realistic possibility,
Saying so doesn't mean it is.
* No, but it makes it a very serious proposal.
two camps should by now be visible, reflecting
the opinions of historians and archaeologists interested in this
topic. Either the signs are letters in a text, or symbols expressing a
calendar system.
Or they are decorative.
* In a broader aspect, a decoration is the same as a (symmetric)
system. Calendar or not.
What concerns Jean Faucounau's's translation, his hypotheses are of
course contradicting mine, with no room for discussion.
If there is no room for discussion, there is no point in posting here.
* This type of dialog has been exhausted completely, you know.
.
- References:
- Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: IE J
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Dylan Sung
- Re: Minotauros
- From: IE J
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Minotauros
- From: hagen
- Re: Minotauros
- From: Peter Alaca
- Minotauros
- Prev by Date: Re: Minotauros
- Next by Date: Re: Minotauros
- Previous by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Next by thread: Re: Minotauros
- Index(es):