Re: OT: Artificial?

On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:18:16 +0200, in sci.archaeology, Peter Alaca wrote:
[SNIP]
quoting Inger:
Neither for those
who aren't, as many of us have, among those with above
130 IQ and thus are used to draw conclusion without
having to spell out every single step, sorry nothing personal
to anyone. For the rest it might seem confusing.

Is there something about IQs so that when someone like Inger has a
middling one (given that she mentions 130, not literally middling but not
what I would call really high) they confuse people, whereas those of us
with high IQs don't? :-)

[SNIP]
Doug
--
Doug Weller --
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Amun - co-owner/co-moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Amun/

.

Quantcast