Re: OT: Artificial?

From: "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 01:30:20 +0200

prd wrote: news:tk7bg.123863$eR6.111014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Peter Alaca" . . . :
prd wrote:
bogart.lloy@ . . . :
p.a. wrote:

That is because an IQ of above 130 in almost
all cases is (far) less then 130.
There is nothing above 100.

I'm almost certain that half the population is
above average. ;-) The other half may *seem*
larger, but on a given day, you can collect a
healthy sample of stupidity from anywhere
along that curve.

There appear to be whole alot of curves in this group.

Are you straight?

Read my mind.

Mm, I see.

--
p.a.

.

References:
- OT: Artificial?
  - From: Peter Alaca
- Re: OT: Artificial?
  - From: Doug Weller
- Re: OT: Artificial?
  - From: bogart . lloy
- Re: OT: Artificial?
  - From: Peter Alaca
- Re: OT: Artificial?
  - From: bogart . lloy
- Re: OT: Artificial?
  - From: Peter Alaca

Prev by Date: Re: E.P. Grondine - 'MAN AND IMPACT IN THE AMERICAS'
Next by Date: Re: partly OT
Previous by thread: Re: OT: Artificial?
Next by thread: Re: OT: Artificial?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: OT: Artificial?
... healthy sample of stupidity from anywhere ... along that curve. ... There appear to be whole alot of curves in this group. ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: OT: Artificial?
... healthy sample of stupidity from anywhere ... But sometimes it is fun to watch. ...
(sci.archaeology)