Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:53:18 +1200
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:50:49 GMT, "Alan Crozier"
<name1.name2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Doug Weller" <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tl92a217ufd7con50qps1k91vbta36i0k0@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:05:44 +1200, in sci.archaeology, Eric Stevensdescriptio."
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:17:17 +0200, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote: news:aje1a21dhebcts3en00oieer1e83gr9s3q@xxxxxxx
Russell Sheptak wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote:
"Peter Alaca" wrote:
Mercator 1633
"Virginiae item et Floridae Americae Provinciarum nova
first ishttp://tinyurl.com/qpu3t
Dudley 1646
"Carta particolare della costa di Florida e di Virginia."
http://tinyurl.com/rzely
There are two interesting things about that second map. The
wellthat, while no boundaries are shown, Florida appears to extend
thenorth into what now would be North Carolina. This suggests that
mightold stories of the Norse having got as far south as Florida
alreadynot be at all unlikely.
I'm not sure why you find this interesting. The Spanish have
andcolonized Florida, which at this point includes parts of North
century.South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi and Louisiana. There are
Spanish Mission's in Georgia and the Carolinas in the 17th
fleetThe English also know this coast quite well. Drake sacked St.
Augustine in the 1580s, and pirates from France, Britain, and the
Netherlands often waited in these waters for the Spanish Gold
havingfrom Mexico to happen by. In the 17th century the French and
English begin reducing the boundaries of Spanish Florida to more
like what the State of Florida is today, pushing them out of the
Carolinas and Georgia.
How does a 1646 Italian map tell us anything about the Norse
asgotten as far south as Florida. You lost me with that statement.
It told me something about the usage of the name 'Florida'. The
standard reaction to the suggestions that the Norse may have got
butfar as Florida is something like "Ooh - that's a long way south",
inits not such a long way south if previously it was held to start
thatNorth Carolina.
Having said that, I still don't know how old is the suggestion of
Norse in Florida is and I don't know where the suggester thought
Florida extended at the time. Nevertheless it does open up for
consideration further possibilities, not the least of which is
whichForget about borders.suggestions of Norse in Carolina might be geographically congruent
with suggestions of Norse in Florida.
That is nonsense Eric. Florida didn't exist in the norse time
and if someone suggests the Norse in Florida, then Florida
was where it is now.
...and not where it was in 1646?
If you don't understand what I am driving at, consider a statement
about the borders of Poland. Where they are depends on the period
under consideration.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/nda/nda29.htm
talks about the Norse in the Carolinas, Georgia and East Florida,
surely means my home state, not any Greater Florida.
That "sacred text" was written in 1906, when Florida had its present
boundaries.
My recollection is that someone (name escapes me for the moment) made
the identification in the early 19th century and I'm not at all sure
that it was original with them.
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- From: IE J
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- From: Russell Sheptak
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- References:
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: IE J
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Dylan Sung
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Russell Sheptak
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudges
- Prev by Date: Re: Bronze Age in the Baltic
- Next by Date: Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- Previous by thread: Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- Next by thread: Re: Iron artifacts validated with prejudices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|