Re: answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- From: "Inger_Eleonora" <inger_e.johansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 08:43:16 GMT
"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l37gb252ec8kj47daege403dcui4vbdrkr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:39:39 +0100, Doug Welleras
<dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 11:48:50 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Russell Sheptak
wrote:
In article <GdTrg.8175$E02.2470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Inger-Eleonora" <inger_e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lloyd and Dylan,
how about reading Oxford's definition instead of pick on me because I,
Yourwell as others here and elsewhere use same as Oxford??????
Artifact definition found here:
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/artefact?view=uk
"artefact
/aartifakt/ (US artifact)
. noun a functional or decorative man-made object.
- ORIGIN from Latin arte 'using art' + factum 'something made'."
------------
In other word accept that definition. That's the one that's valid.
In all fairness to the Oxford English Dictionary, its authors attemptExactly. Dictionaries are often very unhelpful, even misleading, whenpersonal views aren't.
Inger E
To elaborate a point that I think Tom M. made originally, different
scientific fields often develop specialized technical vocabularies that
aren't necessarily congruent with the dictionary definitions of the same
word or words. These technical vocabularies often become a short hand
way of refering to larger concepts. This used to be part of a basic
intro to the History of Science when I was an undergrad.
The Oxford English dictionary definition isn't useful here, since we're
talking about the discipline of archaeology with its technical
vocabulary.
trying to determine the technical use of words in specific contexts.
to cover all usages of all words from the widest range of sources.
This includes scientific publications.
A problem is that new usages are continually emerging and the
dictionary must lag behind by a number of years. Another problem is
that the technical scientific 'shorthand' meaning which is ascribed to
a word today may not be the same as it was even ten years ago or will
be ten years in the future. For this reason it is unwise to insist
that particular words must carry specific meanings which are carved in
stone.
Apart from which, if anyone of you go back to your own books from school
days long ago.... you will find that what we once learnt as definitions in
many cases aren't the same as the students learn today.
Inger E
Eric Stevens
.
- References:
- answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- From: Inger-Eleonora
- Re: answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- From: Russell Sheptak
- Re: answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- From: Eric Stevens
- answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- Prev by Date: Re: answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- Next by Date: Re: answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- Previous by thread: Re: answer to Lloyd and Dylan. - definition artifact/artefact
- Next by thread: Re: Methods treating a written document as an artifact
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|