Re: Questions



Alan Crozier wrote:
"Erik Hammerstad" <egeha.is.all.you.need@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4ntb87FbuetfU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alan, why are you wasting time responding to the IEJ crap?


I keep hoping that she might just, for once, present a source for her
claims. Once again, however, the sources are secret and unknown to
anyone but her. And they are never written in English.

Your hope seems very similar to that of believing that there is a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow :-)

But seriously, the record shows that your quest is bound to fail, especially when it comes to her wild claims with regard to physical sciences. Almost ten years of experience has proved that she does not understand anything remotely related to physics in general, nor to being able to read and understand the relevant literature. So asking her for a reference with regard to for example sea levels will at best result in silence, but could lead to a reply showing what she misunderstood (which might not be too bad), but most often unfortunately, as in this thread, a new tirade of crap.

So, please, and probably on the behalf of many here, may I ask that at you least limit your replies to the few areas where she does seem to have some knowledge (for eaxample medieval texts - but certainly not archaeology), and which you are able to judge yourself.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Questions
    ... especially when it comes to her wild claims with regard to ... physical sciences. ... You are quite right that I am totally unable to judge any statement ... about changing water levels. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Questions
    ... especially when it comes to her wild claims with regard to ... physical sciences. ... You are quite right that I am totally unable to judge any statement ... about changing water levels. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: David Davies on torture,full report.
    ... What matters is that our rather shadowy and terribly sinister secret agencies have undoubtedly been up to stuff that is almost certainly illegal. ... They are only allowed to get up to this sort of thing with the permission of very senior politicians. ... and that the secret agencies would regard such behavior as being acceptable in the circumstances...the end justifies the means...so ... in you're view they're always going to be above the law. ...
    (uk.politics.misc)
  • Re: Evolutionists, agnostics and creationist are all the same
    ... That which is unknown, that of which they hold no vested ... "None of us would seriously consider the possibility that all the gods ... "Therefore, in regard to the Olympic gods, speaking to a purely ... those gods that we were Atheists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: "Chuck" Question about Morgan
    ... protect the secret. ... I know it's a comedy, and I regard the show as an ...
    (rec.arts.tv)