Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:39:59 GMT
Peter Alaca wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: news:1v4Vg.1002$YO.267@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxThis is not archaeology but you folks seem to like things like this.
I have opinion on it.
Like you folks in SHA seem to like Forests,
Waterlevels in the oceans, Ice core dating,
Climate change, the state of Socialism, Gandy, etc?
Actually we do not like anything you have listed but you folks are all over peoples and origins even though there is not an arkie find in the post. Do you want examples?
--
If the Islamics were fascists we would have won in July 2006.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3703
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Iraqi democracy http://www.giwersworld.org/911/armless.phtml a3
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Next by Date: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Previous by thread: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Next by thread: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|