Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:05:38 +0200
Matt Giwer wrote: news:ja6Vg.1010$YO.714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peter Alaca wrote:Matt Giwer wrote:
This is not archaeology but you folks seem to like things like this.
I have opinion on it.
Like you folks in SHA seem to like Forests,
Waterlevels in the oceans, Ice core dating,
Climate change, the state of Socialism, Gandy, etc?
Actually we do not like anything you have listed but you folks are
all over peoples and origins even though there is not an arkie find
in the post. Do you want examples?
No thanks, it was only meant as an example
of an impression.
--
p.a.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- References:
- Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish ancestry is wrong)
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Matt Giwer
- Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish ancestry is wrong)
- Prev by Date: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Next by Date: Re: Wood
- Previous by thread: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Next by thread: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|