Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: "Michael Kuettner" <miksbg@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:31:52 +0200
"Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:4527650e$0$17285$dbd41001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Michael Kuettner wrote: news:eg6n4f$i2b$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxThat was a suggestion, not a command.
"Peter Alaca" schrieb
Michael Kuettner wrote:<snip>
Really, check first, then answer.
I am not interested to check, but as soon as
I meet someone like that, he is gone forever.
Fine.
Killfile him now.
I never killfile on command.
As was my suggestion that you check up his history, so that you
won't have to rely on my point of view.
<snip>
Well, conversing with someone who hasn't learned a single thingMy point.
Anyone sane has killfiled the bitch.
Except for Doug and Tom and you.
Don't tell me we are insane.
in 10 years makes you at least peculiar.
<snip>
No, he decided that European and ScandenaveanYes, and I'm still amused by it.
archaeology is Eurocentrism and racism.
He hasn't answered my post re. classes yet ...
Note for Phil :
I'm mostly interested in European Archaeology because
I live there and like to know where I came from.
The sheer volume of data from excavations pretty much takes
up all the time I can spare for Archaeology.
No racism involved.
Your fascination lies with the Japanese Archaeology.
Are you a racist for that ?
<snip>
Don't blame her for her unhappy life,If someone talks about "my students" or "I have studied History" and
blame her for her behaviour here.
smears people like IEJ does, it is necessary to point out that she is a little
religious bitch who got kicked out of school.
And lives on the dole.
A complete failure, IOW.
<snip>
Well, DON'T.That's nice.
But we _REALLY_ don't need Giwer over here on top of the
kooks we already have.
That's the point.
Then you missed the point.
I didn't invite him, he checked in himself
and I asked him why he posted off-topic.
The last thing we need is Geifer.
<snip>
It was. Doug _had_ a good name. Being nice to kooks didn't help it.As an aside :
Doug Weller seldom posts here nowadays.
His constant "Oooh, Inger, did you mean Y by saying Z" has helped
to destroy this forum for now.
Now that he has helped to ruin it, he has gone to greener meadows.
His friendly attitude did not work, but I disagree
with you that it was destructive.
Many regular posters here left in disgust.
I'm just hanging on on the skin of my teeth.
NOT for newcomers to the group.<snip>
Philip's insane crusade was (/is) not about
reading the archieves, and I am not interested
in what Philip believes or not.
Philip has recognized one thing which you haven't :
If you treat a kook like a sane poster, you'll destroy the group.
As Doug Weller has helped to do.
There is a difference between threating a kook seriously
and taking a kook seriously.
Imagine :
I'm studying Archaeology. Then I find a Usenet group dedicated
to that topic.
I'm happy ! I subscribe !
Then I read the insane rants of Deppo and IEJ and see Doug & Cie
replying politely.
UNSUBSCRIBE.
You get the picture ?
Not really.That Phil was over the top, is true, too.
I wouldn't call his crusade "insane".
"Misguided" or "over the top" come to mind.
I think that Phil has the potential to shorten his posts and make
them more onTopic.
I doubt he has the potential. He tried once and gave
up after ten lines.
If he starts to recognize his limits, he'll come around.
Maybe I should start posting about genetics ? :)
Oh, as one who went to a Technical University, I'm starting to get hisWhen I've asked him, he tried to explain.
Tried is the word.
gist.
He's just not very good at tuning down to laypersons.
<snip>
Why should I help Dietiker?Because correcting a myopic view is better than another flamewar ?
And more productive ?
The confusion of Austria and Australia was a Merkin thing. Splendid Isolation, etc.Are you realy an Australian, or are you just an Austrian?
YHBT. HTH. HAND.
That's one of the oldest trolls on Usenet.
Are you trying to reverse-troll me with "just an Austrian" ? ;-)
Sorry for that. They should teach geography
(and a little bit of history) in school :-)
It went on from the beginnings of Usenet until today ...
It always has the fish jumping for the troll (lure).
Cheers,
Michael Kuettner
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- References:
- Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish ancestry is wrong)
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- From: Peter Alaca
- Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish Myths of British Ancestry (Everything you know about British and Irish ancestry is wrong)
- Prev by Date: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Next by Date: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Previous by thread: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Next by thread: Re: Myths of British Ancestryncestry is wrong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|