Re: Latest on Newport Tower dig

Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx ><news:rlhmm214brpaa07mtcaa1ivmfnqkhuvi18@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On 25 Nov 2006 17:30:43 -0800, "nadia" <nadiasbenz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Nov 25, 1:42 am, Doug Weller <dwel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://www.turnto10.com/news/10392157/detail.html
An archaeological dig at a mysterious Newport Tower turns up -- not
much.

So, still no archaeological evidence that it is any earlier than
the 17th century.

Doug
--
Doug,
I found another newspaper article at the Newport Daily News from
November 24th. It is more informative than the short article that
you just posted. Very interesting.

www.newportdailynews.com/articles/2006/11/24/news/news4.txt

"Touro Park dig comes up empty

By Sean Flynn/Daily News staff
November 24th
NEWPORT - If Nordic Vikings, Scottish Knight Templars or even
stranded Chinese sailors built the Newport tower in Touro Park, they
came and left without leaving a trace - not a coin, nail or a piece
of pottery.
[...]

With the advantage of hindsight, it now seems a great pity that the
team did not research the old maps before they started digging. They
might then have realised they had homed in on the garden paths of the
19th century.

Suzanne Carlson in her article 'Tilting at Windmills: The Newport
Tower' NEARA Journal Vol XXX, 3&4, wrote:

"... it is interesting that on many air photos of the park, one
sees a color variation of the grass approximately twenty
meters southeast from the tower which forms a sharp
rectangular outline, perhaps a house foundation."

Attempts have been made in the past (I think both Mallory and Godfrey)
to obtain permission to explore this area but the permission has
always been withheld. I would like to think that this time, this area
was explored with Ground Penetrating Radar and electrical resistance
measurements but it would not surprise me to find that it was not
included in the current exploration.

This is nonsense Eric. If the tower is older then the
17th century, there must be older remains to be found
in an excavation, but they didn't. Therefore a garden
area away from the tower is irrelevant.

--
p.a.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Latest on Newport Tower dig
    ... On Nov 25, 1:42 am, Doug Weller ... An archaeological dig at a mysterious Newport Tower turns up -- not ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Update on the Newport Tower
    ... "NEWPORT - Is it British Colonial? ... Jan Barstad of the Arizona based Chronognostic Research ... Chronognostic Research Foundation on their motives for exploring the ... a rocky area near the Tower. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Latest on Newport Tower dig
    ... On Nov 25, 1:42 am, Doug Weller ... An archaeological dig at a mysterious Newport Tower turns up -- not ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Latest on Newport Tower dig
    ... An archaeological dig at a mysterious Newport Tower turns up -- not ... Archaeologists who spent the past month carefully digging down to the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Latest on Newport Tower dig
    ... An archaeological dig at a mysterious Newport Tower turns up -- not much. ... Archaeologists who spent the past month carefully digging down to the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Quantcast