Re: Scientist Says Concrete Was Used in Pyramids

Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No. You did not read carefully the paper. It's much more than the
mineral ratio. The binder can't be natural. See arguments in
<1hpx387.1pvd54wf07mzpN%firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx>.

I would be careful with that one. It's just like arguing that nuclear
reactors can't be natural.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor

I don't follow your thinking. What could be the link between the
analysis showing that the binder is different than the one found in the
Stones from the Tura and the Mokkatan quarries, showing that the
chemistry of the binder is not natural, and a natural fission reactor?

Florian wrote:

One again: It is not concrete like we know it (based on cement). Thus it
does not behave like concrete.

I got some information about that in the french science magazine
"Science et Vie". The joints get their final look only months after the
stones are mold, when the blocks shrink upon drying.

--
Florian

"Tout est au mieux dans le meilleur des mondes possibles"
Voltaire vs Leibniz
.