Re: The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
- From: "Peter Alaca" <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:26:43 +0100
Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
Unfortunately there are a number of aspects of the Newport Tower which
its construction as mill do not satisfy. There is some debate as to
whether or not a fireplace belongs in a mill and there is no need for
the architecture of a mill to incorporate the navigational and
astronomical alignments which have been reported. Nor is it clear how
the mechanism of a mill can be properly incorporated, although this
might have been more obvious if the interior structure had not been
burned or the top six feet had not been lost to an explosion.
Every mill is astronomical and navigational aligned.
If you want.
--
p.a.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
- References:
- The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
- From: ghughesarch
- The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
- Prev by Date: Re: Scientist Says Concrete Was Used in Pyramids
- Next by Date: Re: eBay.uk and illegal antiquities
- Previous by thread: Re: The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
- Next by thread: Re: The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|