Re: temple/pyramid plans
- From: "Chris" <chrisg777@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Dec 2006 14:23:33 -0800
Thank you Ken Young. i will check it out.
Ken Down: i can only conclude you do not have any reference
information for me. therefore, please don't post. you may own your
ill-based presumptions but you do not own this site.
thank you.
On Dec 27, 4:29 am, Kendall K. Down <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In message <1167203495.055106.91...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Chris" <chrisg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That was not a helpful post ("wacky"?! Is that how you talk to"sacred sites" 3) and seems worried about their precise dimensions, deserves
people?).Anyone who 1) top posts, 2) comes to an archaeology newsgroup to talk about
to be called wacky.
Ken Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: temple/pyramid plans
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: temple/pyramid plans
- References:
- temple/pyramid plans
- From: Chris
- Re: temple/pyramid plans
- From: David Johnson
- Re: temple/pyramid plans
- From: Chris
- Re: temple/pyramid plans
- From: Kendall K . Down
- temple/pyramid plans
- Prev by Date: Re: What are your 3 favorite historic civilizations and why?
- Next by Date: Re: OT - new tsunami on its way towards Indonesia
- Previous by thread: Re: temple/pyramid plans
- Next by thread: Re: temple/pyramid plans
- Index(es):