Re: temple/pyramid plans

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:30:31 GMT, prd <X_header@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In sci.archaeology message
news:1167264776.401209.304560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx by "Tom
McDonald" <kiltmac@xxxxxxxxx> . . . :

[Rude, ignorant top-posting corrected]

Chris wrote:

On Dec 27, 4:29 am, Kendall K. Down <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In message <1167203495.055106.91...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Chris" <chrisg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That was not a helpful post ("wacky"?! Is that how you talk to
people?).Anyone who 1) top posts, 2) comes to an archaeology
newsgroup to talk about
"sacred sites" 3) and seems worried about their precise dimensions,
deserves to be called wacky.

Ken Down

--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================

Thank you Ken Young. i will check it out.

Ken Down: i can only conclude you do not have any reference
information for me. therefore, please don't post.

That's twice you've posted in reply to someone here. And twice you've
told that other person not to post.

I don't know where the *** you think you are, sonny, but here on
Usenet, no one on an unmoderated group can be stopped from posting.

OT-How much does your blood pressure medication run you a month?
Do you go over to Canada for it? I think I am going to have
to start taking it soon, I don't wanna get bilked.

That's a new word for it. :-)



Eric Stevens
.

Quantcast