Re: temple/pyramid plans

In message <1167316850.165605.180850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Tom McDonald" <kiltmac@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think Chris may have assumed that s.a. was a place where a simple
question would get a simple answer. Of course, that does happen.
However, as your post intimated, folks who have significant knowledge
in a field can often see potential problems underlying apparently
simple questions. And they may take the time to suggest that the
questioner go beyond the simple question to what might be an underlying
trap. You and David did that; Chris apparently objected so strongly to
your tone that he missed the message.

The thing is that if he is some New Age freaky who wants to coat himself in
tar and feathers and do Eagle Sun Dances around Stonehenge, 1) I'm not going
to help him and 2) he should go ask somewhere else, not on an archaeology
newsgroup. If he's not a New Age nutter, he should learn to phrase his
queries more accurately.

I hope Chris thinks this over and applies it to future forays into
Usenet.

And stops top posting.

Ken Down

--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
.