Re: The Search for Homer's Ithaca
- From: "Peter Alaca" <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:50:31 +0100
Uncle Noah <nkavv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
Glad to see that you have refined your first (somewhat unfair)
comments.
The important thing here is not the marine fossils (of course) but the
fact that the hypothesis has not been disproved.
That was the main point of my comment on the press-release.
It is encouraging for the writer, but geology is not enough to
prove the theory. When I have the theory that Ithaca was on
the Dutch coast, that theory is probably not contradicted by
the geology beneath my backyard.
Certainly, there are some years of field research ahead...
Looking at the headlines today, not everyone is convinced
of that: "Heroic quest for home truth is over"
I haven't read the book either. Writing of such book might feel hasty
but maybe this was the only way of invoking the interest of those
necessary (i think you know what i mean).
--
p.a.
.
- References:
- Re: The Search for Homer's Ithaca
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: The Search for Homer's Ithaca
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The Search for Homer's Ithaca
- From: Uncle Noah
- Re: The Search for Homer's Ithaca
- Prev by Date: Re: KO mafia CFR ILLUMINATI ! Global Democracy TRIVOLUZIONE ARTSENU COLD FUSION W post OPEC
- Next by Date: Re: Ancient latrine fuels debate at Qumran
- Previous by thread: Re: The Search for Homer's Ithaca
- Next by thread: Re: The Search for Homer's Ithaca
- Index(es):