Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: "Carl" <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Mar 2007 08:29:41 -0800
On Mar 8, 8:54 pm, <joerevskel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Eric Stevens" <eric.stev...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5ujvu2truitu3uim5tctbuo0n825fm557n@xxxxxxxxxx
...
But this is a rather thin line of arguement since NO other scholar finds her
theories plausable.
...
Incorrect. The scholars have failed to review Dr. Thiering properly
over the past 30 years. This is a serious
breach of the scholarly rules. However, her scholarly work is
published on the Internet and things could change.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: joerevskelton
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- References:
- Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: me
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: me
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- From: joerevskelton
- Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- Prev by Date: Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- Next by Date: Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- Previous by thread: Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- Next by thread: Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!
- Index(es):