Re: Barbara Thiering Refuted!


"Carl" <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1173457781.122848.276140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 8, 8:54 pm, <joerevskel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Eric Stevens" <eric.stev...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:5ujvu2truitu3uim5tctbuo0n825fm557n@xxxxxxxxxx
...
But this is a rather thin line of arguement since NO other scholar finds
her
theories plausable.
...

Incorrect. The scholars have failed to review Dr. Thiering properly
over the past 30 years. This is a serious
breach of the scholarly rules. However, her scholarly work is
published on the Internet and things could change.

Balonry.
Scholars simply look at her delusions and shake their heads.
This is no breach of any rules.
It is common sense.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Jesus multiplying bread and fish
    ... I recently came across a review by Michel Lejeune of Saul's ... into Linear B (not until 20 years later would we have evidence that ... book is erroneous and that its tone was offensive to scholars at that ... have been that the Chinese reached America, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: "Thiering Pesher"
    ... The massive weight of the evidence should scholars (it really counts ... read, study, and review it. ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • Re: At least one sci.archer says more than few are interested in Qumran archaeology
    ... scholarly rules of evidence, attracted some genuine ... Qumran and biblical scholars, and achieved a ... Barbara Theiring fan club and you refused membership to people who disagreed ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • Re: A new definition of the word "content"
    ... but the main reason is to be found in the BIAISED review made by ... Yves Duhoux in 2000, which has been largely publicized, when at the ... reviewer was CENSORED by the A.J.A. MOST of the scholars who read this ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: A new definition of the word "content"
    ... but the main reason is to be found in the BIAISED review made by ... Yves Duhoux in 2000, which has been largely publicized, when at the ... reviewer was CENSORED by the A.J.A. MOST of the scholars who read this ...
    (sci.lang)