Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- From: "grapheus" <grapheus@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Apr 2007 14:35:06 -0700
On Apr 12, 6:43 pm, "hagen" <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 9, 7:42 pm, "grapheus" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 9, 6:20 pm, "hagen" <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 8, 10:32 am, "grapheus" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 8, 10:25 am, "grapheus" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 8, 10:08 am, "grapheus" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 7, 7:36 pm, "hagen" <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Could'nt some skillful people focus down a little and perform an
experiment from a smaller 'landscape', of which only some few
low resolution photo's are available for the public, and thereby
decide once and for all, what is the secret of the 3700 year old
Phaistosdisc ?
Always deluding yourself, Ole !!!
This has been done by people who have seen THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, and
the result is NEGATIVE.
When will you have the lucidity to accept that ?..
My hypothesis, -that this spiraliform structure is a precision-
calendar, revealing information of the ancient picture of the
universe, - is partly depending on that the eroded area in the sign
group called A08 is identical to the sign number 36 (sign P). Have a
look:
<http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/8i.htm>
<http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/phaistos.htm>
The photos in the first hereabove link have been CUT OFF, in the left,
so to make disappear the most part of the "undammaged inverted V"
showing that the identification with sign n° 16 IS IMPOSSIBLE !!!!
And this is up against that this is an old text which perhaps could
bring us one step further towards the *original language of mankind.
Example:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2-v55YrYm8
It is really UNCHARITABLE to make fun of a "translation" made more
than 30 years ago by a guy, who LIKE YOU had thought to find the
solution of the enigma !..
Sincerely yours
grapheus
ADDENDUM :
in the link
<http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/8i.htm>
the "undammaged inverted V" has ben PAINT IN BLUE in the last photo
(bottom right), so nobody can see it!..
For the color-photo at the bottom left, the "undammaged inverted V"
can be seen, but as the photo has been taken, with the light coming
from beneath, the eye sees WRONGLY the hollows IN RELIEF, and the
"undammaged inverted V" looks as "a V in
HOLLOW"!!!.. So, if one wants
to RESTABLISH the CORRECT VISION, it has for instance to print the
photo and to turn it of 180°. Then, the "optical illusion" will
disappear, and he will CLEARLY SEE the UNDAMMAGED INVERTED V in
RELIEF, showing that it is part of an UNDAMMAGED area.
Will you do this, Ole ???
grapheus- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Addition, repetition:
Yes, repetition is needed, because you are repeating yourself the same
argument, without taking into account the remarks demonstrating that
it is wrong !
Sure I'll do that
Well, then you will see, I hope, the "undammaged reverted V" , which
shows that the obliterated sign CANNOT be sign 36...
- allthough isn't this soon a task for NASA or CIA> employee's?-, but only if you can assure me that you are not in person
this unstable fellow, who makes for laughter others verbal
interpretations over the disc in the Google video, that I found. Or
are you John, alias Grapheus?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2-v55YrYm8
I'm surely not this Canadian John Oakley, who participated a few
months ago to a cruse to Crete and Greece, and found this fancy
"traduction" of the Disk in a bookshop near the Herakleion Museum !..
This "traduction" is well known since more than 30 years by the
specialists, and has been used by most of them to "demonstrate" that
the Disk "cannot" be deciphered !.. Allow me, personnally, to believe
more in the opinion and work of the mathematicians Cl. Shannon and J.
Faucounau !.. And I advise you to do the same, what will lead you to
abandon your calendaric beliefs..
Contrary to the guy which John Oakley made fun of, you made a very
interesting remark concerning the "stems". This was fully valid, and
it was in accordance with the work of the mathematicians I quoted
hereabove. But you drew from here false conclusions...
Regards
grapheus- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
25 year ago as a youngster, I decided to devote all my strenght on
finding the message behind the Phaistos disc inscription. Having
succeded this blindfolded double- marathon. Only thing left was to
show forward my result, being prepared for the wake of
enthusiasm.Unless psychopathy rules, unless that someone in need
offends against the laws in the worst way, you've gained the promised
land..
The only obstacle left was the (ferro-) efflorescent area in signgroup
A08, but went upside down the sign P seems to emerge.
NO, NO and NO !.. The "undammaged inverted V" shows that the
identification of the obliterated sign with your Sign P is
IMPOSSIBLE.
Strange that you refuse to see this, when is is obvious when one looks
at the original and remains very clear on your own photography !..
(once corrected the possible optical illusion when the photography is
in the position where light seems coming from beneath).
grapheus
.
- References:
- Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- From: hagen
- Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- From: grapheus
- Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- From: grapheus
- Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- From: hagen
- Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- From: grapheus
- Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- From: hagen
- Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- Prev by Date: Re: Does Dr. Thiering (please see Wikipedia article on her) know any archaeology?
- Next by Date: Re: The Promised Land
- Previous by thread: Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- Next by thread: Re: Help is needed Phaistos Disk
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|