Re: North America's Bronze Age?
- From: "Jean" <jean.lenior@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:44:30 +0200
Jean a écrit dans le message <46322a4b$0$5092$ba4acef3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
activation
Jack Linthicum a écrit dans le message
<1177685794.994156.219640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
On Apr 25, 10:02 pm, "Jean" <jean.len...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
johansson <1732johans...@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le messagefrom
<_7iYh.39476$E02.15...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
First I would like to point to this interesting article:
Levine Mary Ann, Determining the Provenance of native copper artifacts
Northeastern North America: evidence from instrumental neutron
myanalysis
Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 34, Issue 4, April 2007, page
572-587
and ask if it's not about time to recognise that also the so called New
World had a Bronze Age which in some cases seems to have started if not
earlier so at least as early as in the so called Old World? Reason for
13question is that Levine found chemical characterization of copper from
fromWoodland's -geological deposit dating from Late Archaic ~5000 BP to Early
for2000 BP. If the copper is 'gained' from more than a few geologicaldeposits,
this seem to indicate either that people with knowledge of what to look
'finding'and how to 'process'/use the Copper at least might have made same
as done in parts of the Old World where Bronze first were found/made
o????http://www.davistownmuseum.org/bibPreColumb.htmCopper melting in charcoal fires. Provided of course that at least some
tinoxide existed in Copper raw material as it did here in the Old World.
Inger E
This may be of interest!
PRECOLUMBIAN BRONZE TUMI FROM PERU
http://www.artigua.com/stores/xanthos/items/288387/en1artigua.html
Here are some other sites! How valid the information on these sites
is I do not know
http://www.bdomineau.com/gpage11.htmlhttp://ancientamerican.com/
JL
Is this "natural bronze", ie copper with some trace element like
arsenic or tin in it from the ore?
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00243.x?j
urnalCode=arch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallurgy_in_pre-Columbian_Mesoamerica
I have never heard of the occurrence of a native copper-tin alloy even at
Rio Tinto Spain where the ores
of both copper and tin can be found. If a copper and tin ore are smelted
together the results could be bronze.
This is possibly how bronze came about in the first place. Tin is not
found in a native state (as a metal).
It (tin oxide) is smelted by simply heating in a wood fire. Cassiterite
(tin oxide) is the main ore of tin.
It can be found in abundance in Bolivia. Copper ores are common in the new
world.
It seems that at one time metallurgy was advanced to the point of
smelting and extraction
of metal from ores in south and central America. These skill seem to have
either been lost or in
decline by the time of the Spanish conquest.
http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/finalprogram/abstract_61530.htm
http://www.lehigh.edu/~inarcmet/Peru/Peruvian.htm
JL
PS. That the development of metallurgy was arrested at some points seems to
be the conclusion of the paper you cite.
"The forging and annealing procedure they used did not enhance the
mechanical properties of their tools, and may reflect an inherited
metallurgical tradition.
"http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00243.x?j
o
urnalCode=arch
JL
.
- References:
- North America's Bronze Age?
- From: johansson
- Re: North America's Bronze Age?
- From: Jean
- Re: North America's Bronze Age?
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: North America's Bronze Age?
- From: Jean
- North America's Bronze Age?
- Prev by Date: Re: North America's Bronze Age?
- Next by Date: Re: Pictures of Loc 111 at Qumran
- Previous by thread: Re: North America's Bronze Age?
- Next by thread: Re: North America's Bronze Age?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|