Re: Holocaust Denial
- From: ZULU <zulu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 19:25:55 +0200
Roger wrote:
someone claiming to be ZULU wrote
Roger wrote:But holocaust is a term with no agreed definition. And that is the way it is.
Wrong. And wrong.
Define it.
Sure: the Holocaust was 1. the murder of ~12 million non-combatants,
2. nearly half of which were killed for the crime of being considered
Jewish 3. further to a state policy promoting "racial purity" and 4.
carried out by a number of modalities, not least were gas chambers and
mass shootings.
Wrong, you don't even know your Dogma's Handbook.
"The Holocaust" (to be written with "T" and "H") is an exclusive deposited trade mark only applicable to a jews genocide.
And your citation for this is ... ?
hol·o·caust
n.
1. Great destruction resulting in the extensive loss of life, especially by
fire.
2.
1. Holocaust The genocide of European Jews and others by the Nazis
during World War II: "Israel emerged from the Holocaust and is defined in
relation to that catastrophe" (Emanuel Litvinoff).
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/holocaust
The use of the "T" for "The" is according to the writer.
To the other "more normal" or "not-choosen people" victims like gypsies, gays, poles, slavic and so on, the correct term is "genocide" or more commonly employed "massacre".
All three can and are used.
In USA maybe, but in Europe the word "holocaust" is becoming out of purpose in
the media for "normal" genocide. "Normal" means involving not-choosen people.
Nowadays in the media, the word "holocaust" (with minus "h") is not employed anymore for genocide or massacre in order to not confuse people's mind with the real "The Holocaust" which is unique in the humanity's history.And you can cite some sort of policy statement on the part of *any*
media spelling this out?
try Google
"Rwanda's holocaust" 260 hits
"Rwanda's genocide" 29.300 hits
In French
"holocauste du Rwanda" 3 hits
"genocide du Rwanda" 33.300 hits
In Spanish
"holocausto de Ruanda" 6 hits
"genocidio de Ruanda" 27.900 hits
YOu can try in German if you want
Are those objective data enough significative to make my point?
For instance don't speak anymore about Rwanda's holocaust, the correct term is Rwanda's genocide.
To prevent any abusive utilization and confusion about the first trade mark "The Holocaust", the Jewish organizations have launched, since the Lanzmann's homonym movie, the exclusive jewish word "Shoah".
"Shoah" was used long before the movie, idiot.
Do you know reading?
I didn't write it was not used before the movie, I wrote it is becoming
exclusive and each day more frequent since the movie, at least in France.
In France's media you have Holocaust 20%, Shoah 80% nowadays.
Before that film I had never heard that word. I don't speak hebrew.
Shoah is "in" fashioned mainly in France for the moment, but the propaganda will make soon its use very soon generalized all over the media.
And we should go along with your delusions ... why?
BTW, when are you going to get back to your idiot "logic" :
can't understand anything which involves logic, can you?
Gosh! I have to waste again my time to try to explain that for your little
brain. Last time.
If a guy A practices skydiving frequently and another guy B never do it.
How would I write this?
I write "A practices skydiving but/while B doesn't"
Now , if A jumps 10 times per week and B between 1 to 4 times per week,
then I would write:
"A practices skydiving more frequently than B"
Understood?
What you seem to not understand is that it is a bit incorrect to write
"A practices skydiving more frequently than B" if B never does.
NOw if your "logic" doesn't work to pick that one, I can't do anything more for you.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: SV: the "Roman" figurine former SV: Precolumbian artifacts in Mexico....
- Next by Date: Re: SV: SV: the "Roman" figurine former SV: Precolumbian artifacts in Mexico....
- Previous by thread: Back to the archaeology Western Greenland, Buffin island ->Hudson Bay
- Next by thread: Ice Age blast 'ravaged America'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|