Re: To David J
- From: David Johnson <trolleyfan_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 00:28:28 GMT
Doug Weller <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:7j9p53t9731985os9ch1vd0o8rad3vvkbc@xxxxxxx:
On Tue, 29 May 2007 19:59:18 GMT, in sci.archaeology, johansson wrote:
You have problem David?
As usual you are trying to feed false information.
You better believe the contrary to your saying,
if you don't you loose this time as you done in the past.
I think you better start your reading up to present knowledge.
One of the theories is that the cat came to South America 8 million
years ago.( in archaeology.about.com the other year this url was one
of the refered ones: http://www.messybeast.com/cathistory.htm
The interesting and odd thing with that theory is that no one found
that old or close to that old remains. Only theories from DNA-studies.
Which of course could be right, but that I and many others do have
problems with.
Yes, I already posted about the 8 million year thing. Nothing odd
about the lack of fossils. But a 400 000 year old fossil is not a
theory. Let alone the Ice Age fossils which are still too early for
what you seem to be claiming.
Inger, do you not realize that I killfiled you long ago* and thus never
see your posts (except when other's quote them). Like most (except,
probably, those interested in tracing the progress of psychiatric
disorders), I don't _want_ to see any posts from you.
So go away.
David
* And repeatedly thereafter every time you tried to get past everyone's
kill files in your own spammy way.
--
_______________________________________________________________________
David Johnson home.earthlink.net/~trolleyfan
"So many of you come time and time again to watch this final end of
everything which I think is really wonderful and then to return home to
your own eras and raise families and strive for new and better societies
and fight terrible wars for what you know is right, it gives one real
hope for the whole future of lifekind...
....Except of course we know it hasn't got one."
.
- References:
- Inger's 'sacred cats' are the Puma concolor
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Inger's 'sacred cats' are the Puma concolor
- From: David Johnson
- To David J
- From: johansson
- Re: To David J
- From: Doug Weller
- Inger's 'sacred cats' are the Puma concolor
- Prev by Date: Re: To David J
- Next by Date: join an archaeological dig // high school student
- Previous by thread: Re: To David J
- Next by thread: Re: Inger's 'sacred cats' are the Puma concolor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|