Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood

Carl <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Jun 29, 4:56 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Get a good night's sleep, and try this again.
Or better yet, just drop it

Ahem!
You did not, to compare, read Robert Best on Noah and the Flood.
His archaeology takes the cake but I believe it is accurate.

Read and believe what you like, but there is no archaeology of Noah and the flood.
So go praying elsewhere.

--
p.a.





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
    ... Read and believe what you like, but there is no archaeology of Noah and the flood. ... purpose of making war is a strange concept when you think about it. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
    ... You did not, to compare, read Robert Best on Noah and the Flood. ... His archaeology takes the cake but I believe it is accurate. ... Read and believe what you like, but there is no archaeology of Noah ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
    ... "Tom McDonald" wrote... ... You did not, to compare, read Robert Best on Noah and the Flood. ... His archaeology takes the cake but I believe it is accurate. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
    ... "Tom McDonald" wrote... ... You did not, to compare, read Robert Best on Noah and the Flood. ... His archaeology takes the cake but I believe it is accurate. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
    ... His archaeology takes the cake but I believe it is accurate. ... Read and believe what you like, but there is no archaeology of Noah and the flood. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Loading