Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Tom McDonald <kiltmac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:27:32 -0500
Carl wrote:
<snip>
For the sake of getting our thread I started back on track, here are
extracts
from the Robert Best website on archaeology per se. Way cool for a
change would
it be were somebody to make a decision... just buy Best's book off
amazon.com
and respond back to us, especially with an informed opinion on how
well
backed up be Best's archaeology and entire reconstruction.
Have you read the book? If so, why not bring an issue you find interesting from the book here to talk about, referencing the book? Just asking us to buy the book and review it, when it does not seem to be of interest to many (any?) posters here is presumptuous. Perhaps even rude.
<snip>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Tedd Jacobs
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Tedd Jacobs
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Carl
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- From: Carl
- Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- Prev by Date: Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- Next by Date: Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- Previous by thread: Re: Best is best on Noah and the Flood
- Next by thread: Robert Best is best on Noah (historical figure) and the Flood (local)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading