Re: Rao, Osborn, and Frawley


"Peter Alaca" wrote...
Lisbeth Andersson wrote:
<snip.

I did google Frawley and Han*** and found:
http://www.grahamhan***.com/underworld/review2.php

It gave me a feeling of deja-vu. I could have sworn I have read
exactly the same text about Egypt and the pyramids.

Ask me further questions as necessary.

Well, since I haven't got Hancocks book around and it will take
some time to get it, if I decide to get it on interlibrary loan -
is his argument for an older date, that the temples are aligned
with the stars in Orion? Or does he have any other arguments?

no. but it has been claimed and shown that the same 'theory' can be said
for major buildings in new york city. it's all in how you select your data
to match a preconcieved idea, then using smoke and mirrors to accept the
idea as a 'fact' by claiming the 'fact' argues for something else entirly
unrelated. this is a han*** modus operanda always based in if A then B
then C without regard to the constraints of logical falacies (which would
only get in the way, of course).

jmo though,...

[...]


.

Quantcast