Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Doug Weller <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:55:06 +0100
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:34:58 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Daryl Krupa wrote:
On Jul 17, 2:48 am, Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip><snip>
Han***,
is always or can be always backed up by academic authority
Prove that.
I dare you to try.
(N.B.: such an effort is doomed to failure.)
- Daryl Krupa
It's interesting that he makes such a claim, as it's very like his claims
about Thiering in that he has no expertise and no knowledge to back up his
claims, they are just worthless assertions.
Doug
--
Doug Weller --
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Amun - co-owner/co-moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Amun/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- References:
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Carl
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Carl
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Carl
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Carl
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- Prev by Date: Re: Rao, Osborn, and Frawley
- Next by Date: Re: Rao, Osborn, and Frawley
- Previous by thread: Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- Next by thread: Re: A list of archaeological connections would be nice
- Index(es):
Loading