Re: Were the first settlers of Mehrgarh unsophisticated?

Doug Weller <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:48:39 +0200, in sci.archaeology, Peter Alaca
wrote:

Carl <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:


Instead of going round and round, making David Christainsen
do more and more work, the decent thing to do is for
Tom McDonald to get Han***'s book and then check
it for primary sources.

So you still think the decent thing to do it to let others
do the work for you.

He's amazing, isn't he? Claims he wants to discuss archaeology but
doesn't actually want to read any primary sources (and he cites them
even though he hasn't read them, which is at best foolish and could
be dishonest).

And he runs away for honest information
starts talking about something else and/or
starts a new thread. Familiar.
He only touches archaeology because he
wants to stay in this group to preach the
gospel of his beloved Thiering, but he has
no idea what real archaeology means.

And please don't mention Han*** here again.

That's because he can't find an archaeologist to back him up, so he
uses someone who takes a journalistic approach to sources.

Without reading it before making wild claims, and
after that he shows no signs of understanding what
he is talking about.

--
p.a.

.

Quantcast