Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city

Carl <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:

On Jul 24, 6:01 am, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Jul 23, 10:21 pm, <joerevskel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

And I still suspect you of relying on Han***'s interpretation of
what he claims that that Possehl reported of Lukacs findings.

You are quite wrong in your suspicion.

That is a plain lie.
See your answer below.

If you want to discuss a theory that depends on Lukacs; then you
need to begin with a properly referenced quote from him.

According to Lukacs, the teeth of the Period I inhabitants of
Mehrgarh

"contrast strongly with the European dental complex [generally found
in
India and in the neighbourhood of Mehrgarh from antiquity} and share
several dental features common with the Sundadont pattern... The
Neolithic people of Mehrgarh may represent the western margin of
South-Southeast Asian phenotypic dental pattern known as Sundadont."

Gregory L. Possehl, Indus Age: The Beginnings, 489, University of
Pennsylvania Press, 1999

Which you did not read yourself, but quoted from Han***.

True.

Yet, unlike you, I do not get hung up on trivia.

Trivia? This is a sci group.

I instantly intuited that Han***'s entire quote was accurate
as to representing Lukacs well in a nutshell.

Your intuition is worthless.

And, I do not have the time to get bogged down in Peter
Alaca's specifications as far as mere posting on sci.arch is concerned
in that I expect whatever sci.archers are interested in the subject
of my posting to act on their own responsibility to follow thru after
I have also given proper reference to a peer reviewed journal.

No you did not. You parroted Hang***.
A reference you did not consult yourself is not
a proper reference but name dropping.
Ask your daughter or academic friends, or any
other academic or high school student.

--
p.a.



.

Quantcast