Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:21:20 -0700
On Jul 24, 11:35 am, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Jul 24, 6:01 am, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Jul 23, 10:21 pm, <joerevskel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
And I still suspect you of relying on Han***'s interpretation of
what he claims that that Possehl reported of Lukacs findings.
You are quite wrong in your suspicion.
That is a plain lie.
See your answer below.
If you want to discuss a theory that depends on Lukacs; then you
need to begin with a properly referenced quote from him.
According to Lukacs, the teeth of the Period I inhabitants of
Mehrgarh
"contrast strongly with the European dental complex [generally found
in
India and in the neighbourhood of Mehrgarh from antiquity} and share
several dental features common with the Sundadont pattern... The
Neolithic people of Mehrgarh may represent the western margin of
South-Southeast Asian phenotypic dental pattern known as Sundadont."
True.Gregory L. Possehl, Indus Age: The Beginnings, 489, University ofWhich you did not read yourself, but quoted from Han***.
Pennsylvania Press, 1999
Yet, unlike you, I do not get hung up on trivia.
Trivia? This is a sci group.
I instantly intuited that Han***'s entire quote was accurate
as to representing Lukacs well in a nutshell.
Your intuition is worthless.
And, I do not have the time to get bogged down in Peter
Alaca's specifications as far as mere posting on sci.arch is concerned
in that I expect whatever sci.archers are interested in the subject
of my posting to act on their own responsibility to follow thru after
I have also given proper reference to a peer reviewed journal.
No you did not. You parroted Hang***.
A reference you did not consult yourself is not
a proper reference but name dropping.
Ask your daughter or academic friends, or any
other academic or high school student.
--
p.a.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You have not the faintest clue why we are on a senseless merry-go-
round.
Yet, the 17 matches on Google Scholar on "'John Lukacs' Mehrgarh" give
me
enough material potentially to rub it in sharply so that you never
forget it
the rest of your life. But, like I said before, I just do not have
the time.
I am not a typical 60 year old man. My character and personality is
way
too detached; I need intelligent interaction with a circle of friends
and
professionals because no man can do it all alone. I am in a big hurry
to become a force to be reckoned with, to establish a good reputation,
to get a million priorities done.
I report; you decide.
BTW, I take nothing away from Peter Alaca as a good archaeologist.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: joerevskelton
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: joerevskelton
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Carl
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- Prev by Date: Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- Next by Date: Re: France's earliest winery found
- Previous by thread: Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- Next by thread: Re: Jumping to Mehrgarh as at least a farming village if not a pre-Flood city
- Index(es):