I know this is a fake, a forgery, has no provenance and was not
discovered in the course of a properly discovered dig, but what is
actually known of this from reputable scholarly or scientific sources?
Re: Fuente Magna ... I know this is a fake, a forgery, has no provenance and was not ... discovered in the course of a properly discovered dig,... Well it's disputed today if it is a forgery as an artifact or not, ... That one leans heavily on Winters, who is as bad as Edo Nyland. ... (sci.archaeology)
Re: Fuente Magna ... I know this is a fake, a forgery, has no provenance and was not ... discovered in the course of a properly discovered dig,... Well it's disputed today if it is a forgery as an artifact or not, ... (sci.archaeology)
Re: Fuente Magna ... discovered in the course of a properly discovered dig,... Well it's disputed today if it is a forgery as an artifact or not, ... That one leans heavily on Winters, who is as bad as Edo Nyland. ... There are no consensus regarding Winters neither in this case nor ... (sci.archaeology)
Re: Fuente Magna ... discovered in the course of a properly discovered dig,... Well it's disputed today if it is a forgery as an artifact or not, ... That one leans heavily on Winters, who is as bad as Edo Nyland. ... However that has nothing what so ever to do with the Fuente Magna case even ... (sci.archaeology)
