Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Carl <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:48:36 -0700
On Jul 30, 5:54 pm, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Jul 30, 2:28 pm, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
You are quite mistaken on almost every point.
I gave Dr. Gupta for a 2006 review article with 3 other authors.
Did any sci.archer read it? Not that it shows.
If you read it yourself, it doesn't show.
On the contrary it shows in that I respect climatological work in the
Halocene as "very safe" (quoting myself). Also, you already know
I am trained in meteorology.
In halocene meteorology?
Let me guess, you were fired because of lying.
On the contrary I was systems integrator for the Raytheon NEXRAD
(Next Generation
Weather Radar) prototype in Sudbury, Mass USA.
Yet, Dr. Gupta is important because he is a very good, orthodox
scholar.
Did I read his critical 2-page summary in his 1996 book? Yes.
You did not read the book yourself and very
likely you never saw the book.
Why do you require at this stage that I would have read the entire
book?
It doesn't make any sense on your part.
You really should get straight just what I am claiming and what I am
not.
I understand the importance of the book to contain an outstanding
brief review of orthodox scholarship to put Mehrgarh into perspective.
That means I was right.
You were both very right and very wrong.
You are completely paralyzed to show any inaccuracy or deviationWhy don't you read it for yourself rather than asking me to do aWhich means that you didn't read it yourself.
whole lot of typing?
I've already given 5 essential elements of Dr. Gupta in
paraphrase.
We don't trust your copied (in fact stolen) parafrases.
from the truth on my part.
That means I was right.
Tilt; it makes my day.
As I already told Daryl, I am searching specialized databases and
Google Scholar for any archaeologists who know Glenn Milne's and
Lukacs' work etc.
This again is a show of your stupidity.
Glen Milne is a geologist dealing with
sealevels and has no dealing with
Mehrgarh or early farmers in general.
You aren't telling me any news.
Yes I was. Why else calling on him
in defence of 'your' theorie?
I don't call on Glenn Milne in defense of Han***'s bold, speculative
hypothesis.
Yet, I want interested archaeologist to know of Milne's work to
calibrate the
amount of FLOODING along the Indian coastline and elsewhere in
different
time frames in remote antiquity during the end segment of the Ice Age
based on sound geology.
In any of our wrangling I have never called you stupid.
I shall be examining your posted material in close detail and withThe origin of Indian agriculture is relevant.I found and posted a lot of material contradicting
If and when I get promising leads, I'll report back to sci.arch.
'your' fantasies, while you found nothing to support
you. Are you too stupid to find it, or is Hang***
all there is for you?
interest.
It is typical that you didn't do that already.
It shows that you are not interested.
You have not the faintest idea how busy I am every day with priorities
from all parts of the compass or how many friends I have worldwide in
email correspondence. Yet, I also spend stretches of time doing
nothing
more than grooving to swing music or Bossa Nova.
I floated a bold hypothesis so that it stands for the record; I
offered whatever slender support exists in the year 2007;
You did not
Oh yes I did loud and clear.
I want interested archaeologists to
be aware of it as background.
With the result that the whole world
is aware of your ignorance and lying.
You are famous now, Carl.
--
p.a.
What rubbish! - only a few people on sci.arch care about Mehrgarh
in the first place and show the slightest genuine interest in the
subject itself.
If Tom McDonald wants to contribute himself on the close
archaeological detail on how Mehrgarh
is precursor to IVC, he has my permission to do so.
BTW, from now on I prefer you to call me David, instead of Carl. That
way, sci.archers will
forget all about Carl.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- References:
- The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Carl
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Carl
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Carl
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Carl
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Carl
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Carl
- Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- From: Peter Alaca
- The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- Prev by Date: Re: Director of the Chile Pepper Institute doubts Lund example
- Next by Date: Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- Previous by thread: Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- Next by thread: Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west
- Index(es):