Re: The first Mehrgarhans did not come overland from the west

On Jul 30, 8:41 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter Alaca wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:

On Jul 30, 5:43 pm, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Jul 30, 2:28 pm, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
The first Mehrgarans were already farmers, get it?
No
Your answer noted.
BTW, can an archaeologist research Indian sacred texts and
establish that Manu and the terrible oceanic flood was historical
to the immediate pre-Mehrgarh period? IOW, what's wrong with
consulting Indian sacred texts?
It is not archaeology.
So what?

This is sci.archaeology

Don't let your science stand in the way of historical interpretation
of relevant Indian sacred text which might suggest further marine
archaeology in Gulf of Cambay because it is closest to ocean for
Mehrgarh.

You surely show no knowledge of Indian
sacred texts and geography.

You never read me on sci.arch with an honest eye.

I'm afraid I did.

I never take away from your competence as a very good archaeologist.

Typical. I am not an archaeologist.

I look forward for the immediate future to sci.arch conversation with
somebody other than Peter Alaca. IOW, I've had enough.

Try Tom. He loves stupid liars with silly ideas.

Not any more. I've un-bozoed Eric, and replaced him with *CARL*.

I still believe in the possibility of redemption. Unfortunately,
Carl is not interested in redemption.

Well, *** him and the whores he rode in on.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You keep me interested in life.

.