Re: Ballard Chases History Again In The Black Sea

Day Brown <daybrown@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote:

I dont know what Ballard knows Doug. Presumably, he knows about the
*land grasses* preserved in the mud, which would not be there if the
water level came up gradually. If you have some other explanation for
how that could be there, I'd be grateful. I just cannot think of any.

Typical. How about a gradual rising waterlevel?
Do you realy think grasland is not drowned by that?
How shall we call that, 'highly inaccurate'?

R&P report on a series of samples with beach sand that reveal the
original shoreline of the Euxine lake. And, the sonar shows the
channel of the Don & Danube with typical fan shaped deltas entering
the lake. From what we know of trade and local resource management,
this is prime real estate for towns.

No, it are just deltas.
This is sci.archaeology. We are dealing with facts.

Why has nobody looked? If there are no habitation tels there, it'd
blow huge holes in Ryan & Pitman's theory of the Great Flood. You'd
think that all those who want to debunk what they had to say could
fund an expedition with the sonar to prove the settlement mounds are
not there.

I just dunno Doug. It looks like a B grade cliffhanger movie, where
everyone does stupid *** to prevent the mystery from being revealed
so we can all go home and get on with our lives.

No, it is like a very bad movie, whith a lot of
stupid people who are ignorant of the facts
and only see what they like to see.

--
p.a.



.

Loading