Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss

On Aug 18, 3:23 pm, "J.LyonLayden" <JosephLay...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1. You've said this is common knowledge. It's not to me. Can you
provide a useful reference, ideally one that explains the issue on the
basis of real cranial differences between your noggin and those of
Aussie Aboriginals?

Nope. It's only common knowledge to people who frequent aussie bars in
the outback where there's chickenwire between the aboriginal section
and the common section.

It would be politically incorrect for any scientist to do a study on
the differences between the rubustness of two modern Hss skulls I
think.

So you have no scientific evidence.

2. Please quote the relevant bits of the post to which you are
replying. It is basic netiquette, and it helps folks think better of
you.

I think it must be usenetiquette because we don't do that on the
Amazon forums, or the writersweekly forums, or the other forums I
frequent. But I will try to remember when I'm here.

Thank you.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss
    ... Aussie Aboriginals? ... Amazon forums, or the writersweekly forums, or the other forums I ... were replying to me or someone else. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss
    ... Aussie Aboriginals? ... It's only common knowledge to people who frequent aussie bars in ... Amazon forums, or the writersweekly forums, or the other forums I ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss
    ... Aussie Aboriginals? ... How would I go about getting the scientific evidence? ...
    (sci.archaeology)