Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss

On Aug 18, 8:21 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 18, 3:23 pm, "J.LyonLayden" <JosephLay...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

1. You've said this is common knowledge. It's not to me. Can you
provide a useful reference, ideally one that explains the issue on the
basis of real cranial differences between your noggin and those of
Aussie Aboriginals?

Nope. It's only common knowledge to people who frequent aussie bars in
the outback where there's chickenwire between the aboriginal section
and the common section.

It would be politically incorrect for any scientist to do a study on
the differences between the rubustness of two modern Hss skulls I
think.

So you have no scientific evidence.

How would I go about getting the scientific evidence? Smack an
aboriginal upside the head with a fifth of Wild Turkey in a controlled
environment??

Here's the problem you have. If you look at the world only as what you
can verify by science, you will only be seeing a shadow of the world.

When aussies who don't know each other tell me these things
repeatedly, totally independently from one another, I tend to think it
might have some truth to it.

Especially when I then see erectus traits in an aboriginal who only
died 200 years ago.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss
    ... Aussie Aboriginals? ... So you have no scientific evidence. ... Amazon forums, or the writersweekly forums, or the other forums I ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss
    ... Aussie Aboriginals? ... report to have a scientific basis, you would have to show that Aussie ... Aboriginals' occipital and/or parietal bones (depending on what ...
    (sci.archaeology)